The X rebrand is Twitter’s Meta moment… but there’s already a Meta
Photo: Chris J. Davis
Meta’s launch of Threads has been the biggest challenger to Twitter’s social standing to date, with record-breaking uptake in its first weekend. However, Twitter still had an edge: an online culture that would be hard to regrow or replicate; existing creators and content ‘style’, and a brand reputation linked with critical cultural moments that the app played host to, from the US Trump election cycle to the theorising around Tiger King.
Yet this weekend, Elon Musk – who, since his Twitter takeover earlier in the year, has lost or gotten rid of ad revenue, thousands of employees, and potentially a bit of his own reputation– led the company in rebranding from the instantly-recognisable bird to a simple X to match the rest of his business portfolio (but comes equipped already with its own rights challenges). Tweets are now called “X’s”. The iconic blue is now black with a bit of white, the logo so minimal that it could be hard to pick out in a line-up.
Years’ worth of work that has gone into building Twitter as a recognisable brand has basically been wiped away. The question of the hour is… what for?
Twitter is not just an app. It is Musk’s potential in owning a media outlet in the digital-first world, similar to what buying a publication meant thirty years ago. As such, he is co-opting the infrastructure and audience base of Twitter, and he is using it to (try to) build something bigger: a platform of “unlimited interactivity”, with the goal of becoming a sort of WeChat of the West, incorporating online payments, banking, audio, video, and messaging.
The changing context of consumption Emerging consumer trends in a re-saturated attention economy
Rampant attention competition has driven changes in entertainment consumption itself, exacerbated by the last year’s attention boom. Quality of attention and quantity of attention are increasingly differentiated,...Find out more…
Or at least, this is the goal. The difficulty is the Western world already has a similar company trying to do the same thing: Meta. While Meta has launched Threads as a competitor to Twitter, it seems that Musk is trying to re-launch the newly named X as a competitor to Meta.
Zuckerberg oversaw the relaunch of Facebook Inc. to Meta a few years ago – partially to avoid negative PR in light of the Frances Haugen testimony, but also as a way to redirect the company’s ends from simply being a social platform to laying an interoperable infrastructure for web 3.0. The company has tried currency (remember the Libra?) and even dating, and offers across its apps messaging, a marketplace, video, images (both lasting and disappearing), and limited creator tools similar to TikTok’s. Its apps have the highest penetration of any in the marketplace, making it invaluable as a social networking destination and a way to keep up or get in touch with friends both old and new – the phonebook of the digital age, so to speak.
WeChat has such success in China because it is one of a kind. X is entering already-saturated territory, with any need it could possibly meet already being filled by existing platforms and products with already-mainstream uptake. Meanwhile, Musk is getting rid of the one distinguishing factor of Twitter: its brand. A rebrand from Twitter to X is not the opportunity rebranding that Facebook to Meta was; there was no negative brand association with Twitter to wipe clean. This is simply starting over for the sake of starting over, with sky-high hopes for a flagging platform going into a murky and competitive marketplace, during a global economic downturn.